The Legacies of Independence War and Revolution on Criminal Violence in Mexico

Main Article Content

Luz Marina Arias
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8180-8962
Luis Miguel de la Calle Robles
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2099-4746

Abstract

This paper offers a novel approach to the study of criminal violence in Mexico by focusing on its historical connections with the War of Independence and the Revolution. We find that criminal violence is mainly concentrated in municipalities that had a rebel presence during the Mexican Revolution. In turn, the municipalities where royalist militias were created during the War of Independence show less criminal violence today. This legacy of violence appears to travel through two causal paths. Firstly, the most violent municipalities today are those that had on average a lower presence of indigenous institutions during the viceroyalty (the so-called pueblos de indios). Second, municipalities with a higher local state capacity in the late 19th century are better at containing contemporary criminal violence. In contrast, the various land reforms of the authoritarian period do not appear to have a systematic effect on reducing criminal violence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Métricas de PLUMX

Article Details

References

Aboites, L., y Jáuregui, L. (eds.). (2005). Penuria sin fin: historia de los impuestos en México siglos

XVIII-XX. Instituto de Investigaciones Dr. José María Luis Mora.

Albertus, M., Diaz-Cayeros, A., Magaloni, B. y Weingast, B. R. (2016). Authoritarian Survival

and Poverty Traps: Land Reform in Mexico. World Development, 77.

Alonso, F. (2017). From the American Dream to the Mexican Nightmare. How US Border Control Enfor-

cement and Migratory Policies Are Fueling Violence in Mexico [Doctorado]. Instituto Universitario

Europeo.

Arias, L. M. y De la Calle, L. (2021). The Legacy of Civil War Dynamics on State Building:

México 1810-1910. Latin American Research Review, 56(4).

Arjona, A. (2017). Rebelocracy: Social order in the Colombian civil war. Cambridge University Press.

Atuesta, L. H. y Ponce, A. F. (2017). Meet the Narco: Increased Competition Among Criminal

Organisations and the Explosion of Violence in Mexico. Global Crime, 18(4). DOI: 10.

/17440572.2017.1354520

Banerjee, A., e Iyer, L. (2008). Historia, instituciones y rendimiento económico: el legado de los

sistemas coloniales de propiedad agraria en la India. En S. Lavezzolo (ed.), Los determinantes del

desarrollo económico: la causalidad en las ciencias sociales (pp. 223-277). Fundación Pablo Iglesias.

Besley, T., y Reynal-Querol, M. (2014). The Legacy of Historical Conflict: Evidence from Africa.

American Political Science Review, 108(2). DOI: 10.1017/S0003055414000161

Brading, D. A. (1980). Caudillo and peasant in the Mexican Revolution. Cambridge University Press.

De Janvry, A., Gonzalez-Navarro, M., y Sadoulet, E. (2014). Are Land Reforms Granting Com-

plete Property Rights Politically Risky? Electoral Outcomes of Mexico’s Certification Pro-

gram. Journal of Development Economics, 110. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.04.003

De la Calle, L. (2015). Nationalist Violence in Postwar Europe. Cambridge University Press. https://

doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139162258

De la Calle, L., y Schedler, A. (2021). ¿Borrón sin cuenta nueva? La injusticia transicional en gue-

rras civiles económicas. Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 29(51). DOI: 10.18504/pl2957-008-2021

Dell, M. (2012). Path Dependence in Development: Evidence from the Mexican Revolution [Working

Paper]. Harvard University.

Dube, O., García-Ponce, O., y Thom, K. (2016). From Maize to Haze: Agricultural Shocks and

the Growth of the Mexican Drug Sector: From Maize to Haze. Journal of the European Economic

Association, 14(5). DOI: 10.1111/jeea.12172

Fearon, J. D., y Laitin, D. D. (2003). Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War. American Political

Science Review, 97(01). DOI: 10.1017/S0003055403000534

Fearon, L. D., y Laitin, D. D. (2014). Does Contemporary Armed Conflict Have “Deep Historical

Roots”? [Working Paper]. Stanford University.

Flores-Macías, G. (2018). The Consequences of Militarizing Anti-Drug Efforts for State Capacity

in Latin America: Evidence from Mexico. Comparative Politics, 51(1). DOI: 10.5129/

García-Ponce, O., y Wantchekon, L. (2011). Critical Junctures: Independence Movements and Demo-

cracy in Africa. Reunión Anual Asociación Americana de Ciencia Política, Seattle, WA.

Garfias, F. (2018). Elite Competition and State Capacity Development: Theory and Evidence

from Post-Revolutionary Mexico. American Political Science Review, 112(2). DOI: 10

.1017/S0003055417000715

Hernández-Huertas, V. (2020). Candidatos asesinados en México, ¿competencia electoral o vio-

lencia criminal? Política y Gobierno, 27(2).

Ley, S., Mattiace, S., y Trejo, G. (2019). Indigenous Resistance to Criminal Governance: Why

Regional Ethnic Autonomy Institutions Protect Communities from Narco Rule in Mexico.

Latin American Research Review, 54(1). DOI: 10.25222/larr.377

Magaloni, B., Robles, G., Matanock, A. M., Diaz-Cayeros, A., y Romero, V. (2020). Living in

Fear: The Dynamics of Extortion in Mexico’s Drug War. Comparative Political Studies, 53(7).

DOI: 10.1177/0010414019879958

Maldonado, G., y Grau, M. (2013). Elecciones, violencia y estructura social (EVES): base Integral de

municipios mexicanos. Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas.

Ortiz, J. (2014). Guerra y gobierno: los pueblos y la independencia de México, 1808-1825. El Colegio

de México/Instituto de Investigaciones Dr. José María Luis Mora.

Osorio, J. (2013). Hobbes on Drugs: Understanding Drug violence in Mexico [Doctorado]. Universidad

de Notre Dame.

Osorio, J., Schubiger, L. I., y Weintraub, M. (2017). Vigilante Mobilization and Local Order: Evi-

dence from Mexico. Reunión Anual de la Midwest Political Sciencie Association, Chicago, Il.

Osorio, J., Schubiger, L. I., y Weintraub, M. (2018). Disappearing dissent? Repression and State

Consolidation in Mexico. Journal of Peace Research, 55(2). DOI: 10.1177/002234331

Pansters, W. G. (2012). Zones of State-Making: Violence, Coercion, and Hegemony in Twentieth

Century Mexico. En W. G. Pansters (ed.), Violence, Coercion, and State-Making in Twentieth-

Century Mexico: The Other Half of the Centaur (pp. 3-39). Stanford University Press.

Phillips, B. J. (2015). How Does Leadership Decapitation Affect Violence? The Case of Drug

Trafficking Organizations in Mexico. The Journal of Politics, 77(2), 324-336. DOI: 10.108

/680209

Pop-Eleches, G. (2007). Historical Legacies and Post-Communist Regime Change. The Journal

of Politics, 69(4). DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00598.x

Ramírez, L. D. (2014). Crimen y economía: análisis de la tasa de homicidio en México a partir de

variables económicas (2000, 2005, 2010). Estudios Sociológicos, 32(96).

Ríos, V. (2013). Why Did Mexico Become so Violent? A Self-Reinforcing Violent Equilibrium

Caused by Competition and Enforcement. Trends in Organized Crime, 16(2).

Romero, V., y Mendoza, C. (2014). Is Communal Organization an Effective Deterrent to Crime? The

Cases of Guatemala and Mexico. Reunión Anual de la Asociación Americana de Ciencia Política,

San Francisco, CA.

Saffon, M. P. (2015). When Theft Becomes Grievance: Dispossessions as a Cause of Redistributive Land

Claims in 20th Century Mexico (Tesis doctoral). Nueva York: Columbia University.

Sánchez-Talanquer, M. (2017). States Divided: History, Conflict, and State Formation in Mexico and

Colombia (Tesis de doctorado). Ithaca: Cornell University.

Sánchez-Talanquer, M. (2018). Legacies of Revolution: Popular Militias and the Rule of Law. [Wor-

king paper]. México: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas.

Sanderson, S. (2013). Land Reform in Mexico, 1910-1980. Ann Arbor: Interuniversity Consortium

for Political and Social Research.

Schedler, A. (2015). En la niebla de la guerra: los ciudadanos ante la violencia criminal organizada.

México: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas.

Schenoni, L. L. (2020). Bringing War Back in: Victory and State Formation in Latin America.

American Journal of Political Science. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12552

Slater, D. (2010). Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Leviathans in Southeast Asia. Cambridge

University Press.

Soifer, H. D. (2012). Measuring State Capacity in Contemporary Latin America. Revista de Ciencia

Política (Santiago), 32(3). DOI: 10.4067/S0718-090X2012000300004

Tanck, D. (1999). Pueblo de Indios y educación en el México Colonial, 1750-1821. El Colegio de

México.

Tanck, D. (2005). Atlas ilustrado de los pueblos de indios: Nueva España, 1800. El Colegio de México.

Tilly, C. (1992). Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990-1992. Stanford University Press.

Trejo, G., y Ley, S. (2016). Federalismo, drogas y violencia. Por qué el conflicto partidista inter-

gubernamental estimuló la violencia del narcotráfico en México. Política y Gobierno, 23(1).

Trejo, G., y Ley, S. (2020). Votes, Drugs, and Violence: The Political Logic of Criminal Wars in Mexico.

Cambridge University Press.

Valdés, G. (2013). Historia del narcotráfico en México. México: Aguilar.

Wig, T. (2016). Peace from the Past: Pre-Colonial Political Institutions and Civil Wars in Africa.

Journal of Peace Research, 53(4). DOI: 10.1177/0022343316640595

Wittenberg, J. (2006). Crucibles of Political Loyalty: Church Institutions and Electoral Continuity in

Hungary. Cambridge University Press.

Wittenberg, J. (2015). Conceptualizing Historical Legacies. East European Politics and Societies: And

Cultures, 29(2). DOI: 10.1177/0888325415577864

Zepeda, R. (2018). Siete tesis explicativas sobre el aumento de la violencia en México. Política y

Gobierno, 25(1).